North American P-51D Mustang

Revell | No. H-619:50 | 1:72

Hechos

Marca:: Revell
Título:: North American P-51D Mustang
Número:: H-619:50
Escala:: 1:72
Tipo:: Kit completo
Publicado:: 1963 Nueva caja
Embalaje:: Caja rígida (apertura superior)
Tema:: North American P-51 Mustang » Hélice (Aeronave)

Marcas

North American P-51 Mustang

North American P-51D-15NA Mustang

US Army Air Forces (1941-1947)

343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie P (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
Enero 1945 Original (Incorrect) Colour Scheme - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS11136 FS17178 FS13591 FS14255
343 FS, 55 FG, 8 AF CY-G | 44-15701 The Millie G (Maj. Edward B. Giller)
Enero 1945 World War 2»European Theatre - RAF Wormingford, Essex
FS34079 FS17178 FS27038 FS11136 FS13591 FS14110

Contenido de la caja

Bebedero de plástico, Hoja de calcas (al agua)

Boxart diseñado por Brian Knight

Línea temporal del producto

Revell

Revell (Great Britain)

Revell/Kikoler

Revell Japan

Revell/Lodela

Revell/ceji

Alanger

1963

1966

1967

1969

196x

1974

1975

1976

1978

197x

1980

1981

1984

1994

1998

1999

199x

200x

2010

2013

2019

Nuevos moldes

Nueva caja

Mercado

No partner shops available

Revisiones de caja

Reseñas externas

No conocemos ninguna revisión de caja para esto North American P-51D Mustang (#H-619:50) desde Revell.

Comentarios

Stilicho
Aren't there duplicate entries here?

Todos los comentarios (9) » 18 June 2015, 09:40

Stilicho
hat's what I said. "So they are " different . I was not being sarcastic. I didn't think I was imprecise. It was just a superficial observation in passing. All is well. Peace ,brother.

18 June 2015, 21:32

Rex
Sorry, "so they are" could mean that you are agreeing with Gunther, or it could mean that you were repeating your original post. (you only thought the word "different", you didn't type it)

I figured that you were still on the path of combining kits when they shouldn't be,,,,,you have to admit that is where you have been for a while now on here.

But, yes, add that word "different" in there, and you are 100% correct.

(Rex, the stupid "Moh-reen" that can only read what is typed)

18 June 2015, 22:00