Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)
2 in 1 w/ interior
REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35
![Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS](/products/img/4/9/4/963494-16882-82-720.jpg)
Hechos
- Marca:
- REVOSYS
- Título:
- Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
- Número:
- RS-3001
- Escala:
- 1:35
- Tipo:
- Kit completo
- Publicado:
- 2017 Nuevos moldes
- Código de barras:
- 4897083250011 (EAN)
- Tema:
- VK 3601 » Tanques (Vehículos)
Contenido de la caja
Bebedero de plástico, Piezas fotograbado, Hoja de calcas (al agua)
Dimensiones:
380x240x90 mm
(15x9.4x3.5 inch)
Peso:
890 g (1.96 lbs)
Línea temporal del producto
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Instrucciones
Descargar 12024Kb (.pdf)
Mercado
No partner shops available
Revisiones de caja
Reseñas externas
Todas las reseñas » (10 en total)
Revistas
Todas las revistas » (4 en total)
Comentarios
![](/profiles/img/43402-702-s.jpg)
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April 2024, 22:28
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April 2024, 14:15
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April 2024, 21:15
![](/profiles/img/user-s.jpg)
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April 2024, 02:11