train modeling database | ストックマネージャー

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35

Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS

概要

メーカー:
REVOSYS
タイトル:
Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
品番:
RS-3001
縮尺:
1:35
タイプ:
フルキット
発売日:
2017 新金型
バーコード:
4897083250011 (EAN)
トピック:
VK 3601 » タンク (乗り物)

中身

プラスチックランナー, フォトエッチングフレット, デカール(水転写式デカール)

寸法:
380x240x90 mm (15x9.4x3.5 inch)

重量:
890 g (1.96 lbs)

製品タイムライン

 
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
全履歴 »

説明書

ダウンロード 12024Kb (.pdf)

市場

No partner shops available

インボックスレビュー

外部レビュー
Panzer Modell
インボックスレビュー
Panzer Modell
Armorama
インボックスレビュー
Armorama
Armorama
インボックスレビュー
Armorama
Missing-Lynx
インボックスレビュー
Missing-Lynx

すべてのレビュー » (10 合計)

雑誌

(Tamiya Model Magazine 261)
Tamiya Model Magazine | 261
English (TOC: 11 lines)
July 2017
(Model Military International 138)
Model Military International | 138
English (TOC: 14 lines)
October 2017
(Scale Military Modeller Vol 48 Issue 566)
Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566
English (TOC: 11 lines)
May 2018

すべての雑誌 » (4 合計)

コメント

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34
beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
6 April, 22:28
beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
7 April, 14:15
beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
10 April, 21:15
beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
11 April, 02:11