train modeling database | depo yöneticisi

Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk

Academy/Minicraft | No. 1655 | 1:72

Boxart Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk 1655 Academy/Minicraft

Gerçekler

Marka:
Academy/Minicraft
Başlık:
Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk
Numara:
1655
ölçek:
1:72
tip:
Tam kiti
Yayınlandı:
1987 Yeni kutu
Barkod:
048051016557 (EAN: 0048051016557)
paketleme:
Sert kutu (Üst açıcı)
konu:
Curtiss P-40 Warhawk » pervane (uçak)

İşaretleri

Curtiss P-40 Warhawk

Curtiss Hawk 81 A-2
TW 中華民國空軍 (Republic of China Air Force 1920-now)

Kutu içeriği

Plastik ladin (Clear), Plastik ladin, Decalsheet (su kaydırağı)

boyutlar:
190x125x40 mm (7.5x4.9x1.6 inch)

Ürün zaman çizelgesi

 
Academy
Academy/Minicraft
Sunny
Premium Hobbies
Tam tarih »

Talimatlar

İndir 2626Kb (.pdf)

Pazaryeri

No partner shops available

Kutu içi incelemeler

Dış incelemeler
Modelingmadness
Kutu içi inceleme
Modelingmadness

Yorumlar

Juan M Leria
What do we do with this kind of kits?
Much has beed said about the relation of Academy toolings with other brands (this and the Frog one, the MiG-23 and F-104 to Hasegawa, P-39 and Tempest to Heller...), but it is more a matter of copying than retooling; you can't mix those tools without major or minor surgery.
Should we establish that relationship as 'based on ..' or we consider it 'new tool'?
21 October 2012, 09:19
Burkhard D
I propose a new origin entry 're-tool' to go along with 'rebox' including reference to the new tool it is based on.

We shouldn't bother whether we have a case of legal re-tooling or a not so legal copying. If we'd do, it would pose a legal risk to Tim as the owner of the site.
21 October 2012, 10:30
Juan M Leria
That's right. This is one of this cases. It was said this was a copy, but not a 're-tool' as the company hadn't access to the original tool and the parts layout is quite different.
The matter with the F4F is much more obvious and maybe the origin of these believings, it has even the same support stand!
Maybe we should had an entry of 'It is said is a re-tool based on...'
But I think we shouldn't mention it anyway.
21 October 2012, 11:26
Burkhard D
How about 're-engineered' then? Sounds like a nice euphemism to me :-D
21 October 2012, 11:35
scalemates
for me it is a "new tool".... adding the other one will make it more complex... there is currently already a mixing up of "rebox" and "new tool"...
21 October 2012, 16:26

Projeler

10 Görüntüler
Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk View album, image #1
1:72
1:72 Curtiss P-40B Tomahawk (Academy/Minicraft 1655)

Referans malzemesi

Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk (Kagero 25007)
Curtiss P-40 B/C Warhawk
REFERENCES No. 25007
2024
P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk (Wing Leader 24)
P-40 Tomahawk and Kittyhawk In RAF Service - Europe and North Africa
Wingleader Photo Archive No. 24
Neil Robinson
2023

Bütün kitaplar » (84 toplamda) Tüm geziler » (24 toplamda)